Showing posts with label Figure Skating Glossary/Terminology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Figure Skating Glossary/Terminology. Show all posts

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Check please...

While I'm ruminating about foundation figure skating terms which are simultaneously widely used but poorly explained, the one which *really* annoys me the most, (no doubt because of my personal lack of execution), is the term "check".  This was highlighted the other day when a fellow adult skater asked me to define the term.  After a bit of hem-hawing, the best I could do was to mumble something about moving one's arms and maybe the free leg in order to snuff out the rotational momentum initiated by the curve leading into a turn or jump or a spin.  I did a 3-turn to demonstrate "checking" but couldn't offer a concise description of the  actual mechanics of what was going on. 

Unsatisfied, I went home and did what any 21st century human would do; I went on a google-search safari.  My first stop was  USFSA's on-line glossary of skating terms.  Guess what?  It doesn't bother to list the word "check".  I suppose their stance is if you need to ask about something this basic, you probably ought to forget about figure skating and take up stamp collecting.

Googling a little deeper, <about.com> wasn't all that informative either, saying only that "In figure skating, when a skater lands a jump or completes a turn, he or she checks the landing or checks the turn. Checking prevents the skater from continuing to turn or rotate once a jump or turn is completed."  Don't you just love circular definitions?

Other on-line sources were equally vague and continued google-trolling quickly disintegrated into nonsense; disclosure: no porn sites were "surveyed" during the creation of this blog post.  I was left wondering is there no source brave enough to define exactly what goes on during this mysterious "checking" business? 

I next dug out my three favorite figure skating books, sections of which I reread like a hypochondriac attempting yet another self diagnosis based on whichever demon has resurfaced as my wonky element du jour.  Here's how those authors weigh in on the subject :

Karin Kunzle-Watson's Ice Skating Steps to Success  talks about "turning within the arms".  This description may be perfectly clear to some readers but it leaves your old diarist more, rather than less mystified.

Carole Shulman's The Complete Book of Figure Skating comes a bit closer in defining a check, stating that one checks "to stop or control rotation by reversing the arms against the hips".

Finally, turning to Robert S. Ogilvie's classic book Basic Ice Skating Skills  I came across the following sentence in reference to a three turn:  "Check is the reversal of the rotation that is deliberately set up to make the turn."

I read and reread different parts of each book, sifting through the words like a fortune teller examining tea leaves in an attempt to integrate these three statements.  Maybe I should have dug out my "magic 8 ball".


Where did this consultation with the skating oracles leave me?  For one thing, it made me realize that although check implies the ability to control rotational momentum, successfully obtaining that control is achieved by different means during each situation wherein one is handed the fleeting chance of either extinguishing left over rotation or quickly spiraling out of orbit.

Using Ogilive's example of a forward outside three turn, from personal experience I can report that successfully controlling this single foot turn requires different applications of "checking" depending on how much speed a skater is carrying into the turn.  If I execute a FO3 at a pedestrian pace, a slight tweak of the shoulders might be all that's required.  If I barrel into the same turn with a lot of heat the turn then requires careful control of the arms, the shoulders, the hips, keeping the chin up, remembering to smile, and oh yes, that free leg had better not drift around too much or I'll be forced to put the free skate down on the ice long before I originally intended.  Unintentional "dropped 3s" don't git-ya where ya wanna go in terms of demonstrating control--especially during the Waltz Eight portion of the Pre-Bronze Moves test.

So, to a degree, the amount of speed or perhaps more accurately, the amount of momentum preceding the element dictates what the definition of "check" will be in that particular situation.  Check then, is not a "one size fits all" kinda thing.  It turns out to be a moving target.  I'm going to need literally hundreds of check definitions.  Let's see, there are six or so turns, each with eight family members, a half dozen single rotational jumps (forget about doubles; ain't happenin' in my lifetime), and several spins, all of which can be entered into with differing amounts of momentum.  Yep, that's a whole lot of definitions.   This is why no one but a foolish old diarist attempts to nail down the term.

So, I feel better for all that.  Sort of.  At least for the moment.  Well, not really.  The true skating hypochondriac is never far from his next demon... 

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Cleaning up fuzzy logic.

My "dawncing" partner is off motor racing with her leading man so it was just me and coach K. for this week's lesson.  This was actually a good thing in that it allowed me to at least partially clear up some poorly understood concepts.  Things like what exactly does a coach mean when (s)he talks about "flow" or "power"?  You hear these terms all the time but nobody defines them.  Defining things is an adult preoccupation.  Kid skaters don't bother worrying about definitions.  They just get on with skating.  But I'm adult (regardless of what my wife might say) and definitions are important to how I come to understand stuff.  With that in mind, we invested five minutes at the beginning of today's lesson talking over a few concepts.

"Flow" in simplest terms equates to smoothness.  It's one of those qualities that's hard to describe but you know it when you see it.  A skater glides effortlessly across the ice, blades noiselessly skimming the surface with one skating element seamlessly blending into another without discernible beginning or end.  A component of Flow is "power".  Without power, flow doesn't happen.

"Power" equates to the ability to accelerate.  That's not to say that power is all about speed.  Speed without control is not "power".  The genesis of power is found within the push.

In ice dance one must push back rather than to the side in order to avoid your partner's legs.  Poorly executed back pushes do not generate very much power.  Since I began skating with V. I've been compensating for my reduced push power by engaging in the dreaded "toe push" style of stroking, no doubt subconsciously trying not to trade kicks with my partner.  Today coach K. worked hard to correct that.  Pushing back at first felt very awkward and didn't generate much power but as she got me to introduce more knee bend my pushes started to produce more glide.  This felt great as long as I was straight line skating and didn't have to think about turning, but as soon as I started to dial progressives or swing rolls back into the picture the wheels fell off my "flow" wagon.  Clearly it's going to take a good bit of work to hoist your old diarist up the flow and power charts.  Not to worry--I'll get there.

We next talked about the subject of "Leading" verses "Tracking".  Coach K. started drawing little x marks on the ice to represent Synchro skaters in a line.  Coaching Synchro is one of her other assignments at our rink.  After a while, sensing that I was glazing over, she dumbed it down to just two Xs side by side, a la a dance couple.  In ice dance it's not always about the man "leading" the lady during the dance.  The roles of leading and tracking tend to change depending on which partner is on the inside and which partner is on the outside of a lobe (for the non-dancers in the audience, you can equate the word "lobe" with "curve").  For simple elements like progressives or forward swing rolls, the skater on the inside "leads" slightly, while the skater on the outside "tracks".  This relationship changes quite often even in the relatively simple preliminary dances.  The Dutch Waltz is an example:


At the start, in Kilian dance hold, I would be to the left of V.  After our four optional entry strokes we would enter the first lobe of the dance which calls for a CCW progressive.  I would be on the inside of the curve and hence be leading V. slightly.  After step three of the progressive our roles would reverse with V. leading and me tracking as we execute the second lobe, a 6 beat swing roll to the right.  We would continue to swap leading and tracking duties all the way around the pattern.

This will no doubt become second nature but for the moment there's a lot of push-me-pull-me stuff going on due to the combination of our lack of pair unison, weak technique and the centrifugal inertia (pulling us apart) and centripital force (pushing us back together) generated by skating the lobes of the dance, even at the modest speed required by the DW.  It constantly renews my respect for pairs who skate these dances with flow and power (you knew I'd some how complete the circle didn't you?).

But don't take my word for it; I'm no expert.  Lace up your skates and get out on ice.